BIOM25: 16S Practical

16S Lecture Slides

http://nickloman.github.io/static/BIOM25 16S Lecture.pptx

16S Practical

In this practical we will analyse datasets from several studies, some very important, others perhaps just a little silly.

The datasets we have are:

General questions

Q: What is the difference between alpha- and beta-diversity?

##CSI: Microbiome

Original paper: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/keyboard/keyboard_paper.pdf

Results: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/keyboard/core2/

Important metadata fields for this project:

Hint: M1, M2 and M9 are the three participants referred to in the paper.

Q: What are the most abundant taxa?

Q: Check the PCA plots, do samples cluster by key, or by subject (hint: HOST_SUBJECT_ID, )

Q: Go back to the taxa barplots, can you figure out which taxa are driving the variation producing grouping?

Q: Which of these taxa are part of the normal skin microbiome? Are any out of plcae? Where might they come from?

Q: Do you think this technique will really be usable for forensics? What are the challenges? What other techniques might work better for studying the microbiome?

##Restroom surfaces

Paper: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/restrooms/pone.0028132.pdf

Results: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/restrooms/core/

Fields of importance: Floor, Level, SURFACE, BUILDING

Q: What surfaces have the greatest amount of diversity? Is this expected?

Q: What do the profiles of stool, etc. look like?

Q: Are there any natural looking clusters in the data?

Q: Which sources of samples are most similar to others?

Q: Is there any clustering between different floors of the building?

Q: Compare the weighted vs unweighted Unifrac results, do the clusters look more natural in one or the toher?

Q: Which surfaces have the most diversity? Least?

Human microbiome in space and time

Paper: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/spacetime/nihms245011.pdf

Fields of importance: HOST_INDIVIDUAL, SEX, Description_duplicate, COMMON_NAME

Results:

Alpha diversity: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/spacetime/core/arare_max500/alpha_rarefaction_plots/rarefaction_plots.html

Bar plots: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/spacetime/core/taxa_plots/taxa_summary_plots/bar_charts.html

Bar plots by sample site: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/spacetime/core/taxa_plots_COMMON_SAMPLE_SITE/taxa_summary_plots/bar_charts.html

PCoA analysis: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/spacetime/core/bdiv_even500/unweighted_unifrac_emperor_pcoa_plot/index.html

http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/spacetime/core/

Q: Is there evidence of natural clusters?

Q: Do samples cluster by individual?

Q: What are the most dominant taxa in stool, skin, urine? How do they differ?

Infant gut metagenome

Paper: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/infant_time_series/PNAS-2011-Koenig-4578-85.pdf

Results: http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/filedist/16stutorial/infant_time_series/core/

Fields of importance:

Q: Is there any evidence of a gradient? (Key: use SampleID and turn gradient colours on)

Q: How do the taxa change over time?

Q: Which infant samples do the maternal stool most look like?

Q: How does diversity change over time?

##Instructor notes on building this tutorial