AGBT 2012 Blog Post Round-up
17 Feb 2012A round-up of blog posts covering AGBT ... will add to this when something catches my eye.
This blog
- Oxford Nanopore megaton announcement: “Why do you need a machine?” – exclusive interview for this blog!
- All the Oxford Nanopore videos
- Which technology won AGBT?
- AGBT 2012 day 1 tweets
- AGBT 2012 day 2 tweets
- AGBT 2013 day 3 tweets
- AGBT 2012 day 4 tweets
</ul>
Massgenomics (Dan Koboldt)
- AGBT 2012 Day 1: Clinical Annotation and Fierce Competition
- AGBT 2012 Day 2: Cancer, Technology, and Oxford Nanopore
- AGBT 2012 Last Day: Elephants in the Room
</ul>
Omicsomics (Keith Robison)
- Oxford Nanopore Doesn't Disappoint
</ul>
CoreGenomics (James Hadfield)
- Oxford Nanopore did not disappoint
- Day 1 round-up
- Day 2 round-up
</ul>
GenomesUnzipped (Luke Jostins and gang)
- Making sequencing simpler with nanopores
</ul>
EdgeBio
- AGBT Update #2 "Jonathan Rothberg did not disappoint and delivered some pretty bold statements about where they are heading with the Proton"
</ul>
Seqanswers.com
- Discussion of GnuBIO and Lasergen announcements
</ul>
Illumina
- Perspectives from the Illumina user group meeting discusses the MiSeq: "at 250 cycles, the raw error rate is only 0.69%"
- Thursday Morning at AGBT
- Illumina AGBT coverage page
</ul>
#notAGBT
- Discussion of GnuBIO and Lasergen announcements
</ul>
- AGBT Update #2 "Jonathan Rothberg did not disappoint and delivered some pretty bold statements about where they are heading with the Proton"
</ul>
- Making sequencing simpler with nanopores
</ul>
- Oxford Nanopore Doesn't Disappoint
</ul>